Chief Justice Roberts is concerned about the consequence of the tone of dissents at the Court. As he writes:
It has become a disturbing feature of some recent opinions to criticize the decisions with which they disagree as going beyond the proper role of the judiciary. … Reasonable minds may disagree with our analysis — in fact, at least three do. See post, p. ___ (KAGAN, J., dissenting). We do not mistake this plainly heartfelt disagreement for disparagement. It is important that the public not be misled either. Any such misperception would be harmful to this institution and our country.
It’s a fair concern, I’m sure that Kagan’s disagreement is not meant as disparagement, and I’m sure the public is “misled” to believe the contrary.
But perhaps there are other examples the Chief should reflect upon as well.
The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this…
