It’s “citizen-funded” not because you ignore the fact that “that’s money taken from citizens” but precisely because it’s money “taken” from citizens and given directly back to them.

And re “ban[ing] other spending”: Again, your words, not mine. As I’ve explained (Republic, Lost v2 (2015)), at a minimum we need to change the dependencies for funding congressional campaigns — shifting to citizens generally rather than an unrepresentative few. Beyond that, I support reversing SpeechNow, which wouldn’t affect “spending” but would give Congress the power to limit contributions to independent political action committees. That wouldn’t “ban other spending”; it would just avoid the corrupting dynamic we now see with superPACs. My expectation is that those two changes will be enough to end the corrupting dependence Congress now has.

Written by

law professor, activist.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store